REVIEW 3 cited by
Can $\overline{\rm { MS}}$ parton distributions be negative?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
It is common lore that Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) in the $\overline{\rm { MS}}$ factorization scheme can become negative beyond leading order due to the collinear subtraction which is needed in order to define partonic cross sections. We show that this is in fact not the case and next-to-leading order (NLO) $\overline{\rm { MS}}$ PDFs are actually positive in the perturbative regime. In order to prove this, we modify the subtraction prescription, and perform the collinear subtraction in such a way that partonic cross sections remain positive. This defines a factorization scheme in which PDFs are positive. We then show that positivity of the PDFs is preserved when transforming from this scheme to $\overline{\rm { MS}}$, provided only the strong coupling is in the perturbative regime, such that the NLO scheme change is smaller than the LO term.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Factorisation schemes for proton PDFs
All common NLO factorisation schemes for proton PDFs are special cases of a single discrete family, and scheme choice can shift LHC jet predictions by up to 20-30%.
-
The Scaffold Effect: How Prompt Framing Drives Apparent Multimodal Gains in Clinical VLM Evaluation
Merely mentioning MRI availability in the prompt drives 70-80% of apparent multimodal F1 gains in clinical VLMs, even when no imaging is present.
-
On the quarkonium-in-jet collinear fragmentation at moderate-to-large transverse momentum
A preliminary NLO set of quarkonium fragmentation functions, NRFF1.0, is introduced and proposed as input for quarkonium-in-jet fragmentation studies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.