Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Redefinition of the Halo Boundary Leads to a Simple yet Accurate Halo Model of Large Scale Structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.12751 v1 pith:JTZXIPIM submitted 2020-06-23 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords haloboundaryfunctionmodelapproxcorrelationhalo--massproposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a model for the halo--mass correlation function that explicitly incorporates halo exclusion. We assume that halos trace mass in a way that can be described using a single scale-independent bias parameter. However, our model exhibits scale dependent biasing due to the impact of halo-exclusion, the use of a ``soft'' (i.e. not infinitely sharp) halo boundary, and differences in the one halo term contributions to $\xi_{\rm hm}$ and $\xi_{\rm mm}$. These features naturally lead us to a redefinition of the halo boundary that lies at the ``by eye'' transition radius from the one--halo to the two--halo term in the halo--mass correlation function. When adopting our proposed definition, our model succeeds in describing the halo--mass correlation function with $\approx 2\%$ residuals over the radial range $0.1\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc} < r < 80\ h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, and for halo masses in the range $10^{13}\ h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot} < M < 10^{15}\ h^{-1}{\rm M}_{\odot}$. Our proposed halo boundary is related to the splashback radius by a roughly constant multiplicative factor. Taking the 87-percentile as reference we find $r_{\rm t}/R_{\rm sp} \approx 1.3$. Surprisingly, our proposed definition results in halo abundances that are well described by the Press-Schechter mass function with $\delta_{\rm sc}=1.449\pm 0.004$. The clustering bias parameter is offset from the standard background-split prediction by $\approx 10\%-15\%$. This level of agreement is comparable to that achieved with more standard halo definitions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anisotropic Secondary Bias of Dark Matter Haloes in a $\Lambda$CDM Universe

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Halo spin and elongation create a direction-dependent clustering signal that is governed by alignment with the surrounding cosmic web, whereas orientation-averaged secondary bias is governed by tidal anisotropy.

  2. Baryonification II: Constraining feedback with X-ray and kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ACT kSZ and eROSITA gas fractions are mutually consistent in a baryonification fit and imply strong feedback, with predicted matter power suppression reaching 20-25 percent at k=5 h/Mpc.

  3. The Density Profile of Dynamical Halos

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For dynamical dark matter halos, the orbiting density profile at fixed mass is set by one scale, the halo radius, whose scatter shrinks from 16% to 11% when formation time is included.

Pith tools