REVIEW 3 cited by
Circular orbit of a particle and weak gravitational lensing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we introduce a geometric approach to study the circular orbit of a particle in static and spherically symmetric spacetime based on Jacobi metric. Second, we apply the circular orbit to study the weak gravitational deflection of null and time-like particles based on Gauss-Bonnet theorem. By this way, we obtain an expression of deflection angle and extend the study of deflection angle to asymptotically non-flat black hole spacetimes. Some black holes as lens are considered such as a static and spherically symmetric black hole in the conformal Weyl gravity and a Schwarzschild-like black hole in bumblebee gravity. Our results are consistent with the previous literature. In particular, we find that the connection between Gaussian curvature and the radius of a circular orbit greatly simplifies the calculation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Gaussian curvature and Lyapunov exponent as probes of black hole phase transitions
Gaussian curvature at the light ring inherits the swallowtail multivaluedness of free energy in first-order black hole phase transitions, following directly from K = -λ².
-
Extended uncertainty principle inspired black hole in a G\"odel Universe
A Godel-rotation-modified uncertainty principle is used to define a corrected black hole mass, producing enlarged horizon, shadow, and deflection with lower bounds a/M ~ 10^5 from EHT and PPN data.
-
Charged black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity: Weak Deflection Angle, Shadow cast, Quasinormal Modes and Neutrino annihilation
The Kalb-Ramond black hole phenomenology is mostly an extension of known results, and its shadow formula is internally inconsistent, invalidating the EHT-based constraints.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.