REVIEW 8 cited by
Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We have previously shown (arXiv:1912.00033) that three approaches to relational quantum dynamics -- relational Dirac observables, the Page-Wootters formalism and quantum deparametrizations -- are equivalent. Here we show that this `trinity' of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector. We ascribe the time according to the clock subsystem to a POVM which is covariant with respect to its (quadratic) Hamiltonian. This differs from the usual choice of a self-adjoint clock observable conjugate to the clock momentum. It also resolves Kucha\v{r}'s criticism that the Page-Wootters formalism yields incorrect localization probabilities for the relativistic particle when conditioning on a Minkowski time operator. We show that conditioning instead on the covariant clock POVM results in a Newton-Wigner type localization probability commonly used in relativistic quantum mechanics. By establishing the equivalence mentioned above, we also assign a consistent conditional-probability interpretation to relational observables and deparametrizations. Finally, we expand a recent method of changing temporal reference frames, and show how to transform states and observables frequency-sector-wise. We use this method to discuss an indirect clock self-reference effect and explore the state and temporal frame-dependence of the task of comparing and synchronizing different quantum clocks.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Schr\"odinger Symmetry in Spherically-symmetric Static Mini-superspaces with Matter Fields
Spherically symmetric static gravity with Maxwell or massless-scalar matter exhibits Schrödinger symmetry after a canonical transformation, yielding (A)dS-Reissner-Nordström and generalized Janis-Newman-Winicour solutions.
-
Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories
Quantum reference frames built from Wilson lines give lattice gauge theories gauge-invariant subsystem factorizations and a hierarchy of relational entanglement entropies.
-
Relational Observables in Group Field Theory
POVM-based conditioning on scalar-field quantum reference frames defines relational observables in group field theory that match prior number and volume results on coherent states.
-
Gauge vs (hidden) physical symmetries of FLRW cosmologies
For flat FLRW with n free massless scalars, the physical symmetry algebra of the minisuperspace is conf(n,1), and the Schrödinger algebra seen in the Eisenhart-Duval lift is gauge-dependent except for the single-field case.
-
On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames
For ideal quantum reference frames with a single constraint, the perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective semiclassical approaches describe the same physics and the same frame-switching rules.
-
Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy
Gravitational subregion entropy is observer-dependent: different quantum clocks produce different von Neumann algebras and different entropy functionals for the same global state.
-
Linearization (in)stabilities and crossed products
Second-order Taub charge constraints are justified as linearization stability conditions in spatially closed spacetimes, while in boundary or no-isometry cases the justification is weaker and depends on interest in se...
-
Large effects from quantum reference frames
A quantum reference frame with one turning point produces a large, Planck-constant-independent shift in the measured system's position relative to any classical treatment.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.