REVIEW 2 cited by
Incompleteness Matters Not: Inference of $H_0$ from BBH-galaxy cross-correlations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show how the angular clustering between gravitational-wave standard sirens and galaxies with known redshifts allows an inference of the Hubble constant, regardless of whether the host galaxies of any of these sirens are present in the galaxy catalog. We demonstrate this for the first time with realistic simulations of gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes in a three-detector network with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo sensitivities. We show that with such a network, the cross-correlation technique can be used to infer the Hubble parameter with a precision of less than 10% (2%) at 90% confidence with 50 (500) sources, even with a 100% incomplete catalog, which does not contain the hosts of any of the gravitational-wave events. We compare our method with the current state-of-the-art techniques used for the inference of the Hubble parameter from real data. We argue that, if the clustering information is not used explicitly, the inference of $H_0$ from real data is expected to be prior-dominated.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Modeling Gravitational Wave Bias from 3D Power Spectra of Spectroscopic Surveys
Using mock gravitational wave catalogs built from the SDSS DR7 galaxy survey, the clustering bias of GW sources is most sensitive to host stellar mass, secondarily to star formation rate, and nearly insensitive to met...
-
Gravitational Wave Cosmology
A review of standard siren cosmology: gravitational wave sources measure luminosity distance directly, and redshift comes from electromagnetic counterparts, galaxy catalogs, or mass spectrum features.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.