Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Investment, Heterogeneous Consumption and Best Time for Retirement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.00392 v2 pith:FLDSRW5L submitted 2020-08-02 q-fin.PM q-fin.RM

classification q-fin.PMq-fin.RM
keywords goodsutilityconsumptionoptimalwealthbasicconsumeheterogeneous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies an optimal investment and consumption problem with heterogeneous consumption of basic and luxury goods, together with the choice of time for retirement. The utility for luxury goods is not necessarily a concave function. The optimal heterogeneous consumption strategies for a class of non-homothetic utility maximizer are shown to consume only basic goods when the wealth is small, to consume basic goods and make savings when the wealth is intermediate, and to consume almost all in luxury goods when the wealth is large. The optimal retirement policy is shown to be both universal, in the sense that all individuals should retire at the same level of marginal utility that is determined only by income, labor cost, discount factor as well as market parameters, and not universal, in the sense that all individuals can achieve the same marginal utility with different utility and wealth. It is also shown that individuals prefer to retire as time goes by if the marginal labor cost increases faster than that of income. The main tools used in analyzing the problem are from PDE and stochastic control theory including variational inequality and dual transformation. We finally conduct the simulation analysis for the featured model parameters to investigate practical and economic implications by providing their figures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Amortized Inference of Multi-Modal Posteriors using Likelihood-Weighted Normalizing Flows

    cs.LG 2025-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Training a normalizing flow on prior samples weighted by likelihood can approximate a posterior, but matching the base distribution's number of modes to the target is needed to avoid spurious bridges.

Pith tools