Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can $f(R)$ gravity relieve $H_0$ and $\sigma_8$ tensions?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.03966 v2 pith:UX5XCEXB submitted 2020-08-10 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords sigmacosmicgravityrelievetensionsbackgrounddistortionsmicrowave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

To investigate whether $f(R)$ gravity can relieve current $H_0$ and $\sigma_8$ tensions, we constrain the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$ gravity with Planck-2018 cosmic microwave background and redshift space distortions observations. We find that this model fails to relieve both $H_0$ and $\sigma_8$ tensions, and that its two typical parameters $\log_{10}f_{R0}$ and $n$ are insensitive to other cosmological parameters. Combining the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, Type Ia supernovae, cosmic chronometers with redshift space distortions observations, we give our best constraint $\log_{10}f_{R0}<-6.75$ at the $2\sigma$ confidence level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is cosmological data suggesting a nonminimal coupling between matter and gravity?

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fitting a one-parameter modified gravity model to Pantheon+, DES, and BAO data gives mixed evidence: the n=6 version is preferred by information criteria in most combinations, but n=4 and n=10 are often disfavored, an...

Pith tools