Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Building Models of Inflation in No-Scale Supergravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.01709 v1 pith:PBH2F4WQ submitted 2020-09-03 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

classification hep-phastro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords modelsno-scaleinflationsupergravitythencosmologicalframeworkincluding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

After reviewing the motivations for cosmological inflation formulated in the formalism of supersymmetry, we argue that the appropriate framework is that of no-scale supergravity. We then show how to construct within this framework inflationary models whose predictions for the tilt in the spectrum of scalar perturbations, $n_s$, and the ratio, $r$, of tensor and scalar perturbations coincide with those of the $R + R^2$ model of inflation proposed by Starobinsky. A more detailed study of no-scale supergravity reveals a structure that is closely related to that of $R^2$ modifications of the minimal Einstein-Hilbert action for general relativity, opening avenues for constructing no-scale de Sitter and anti-de Sitter models by combining pairs of Minkowski models, as well as generalizations of the original no-scale Starobinsky models of inflation. We then discuss the phenomenology of no-scale models of inflation, including inflaton decay and reheating, and then the construction of explicit scenarios based on SU(5), SO(10) and string-motivated flipped SU(5)$\times$U(1) GUT models. The latter provides a possible model of almost everything below the Planck scale, including neutrino masses and oscillations, the cosmological baryon asymmetry and cold dark matter, as well as $n_s$ and $r$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ACT stands for Awkward Cosmology Theories

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reconciling Starobinsky inflation with ACT data requires fine-tuned higher-curvature scales, stiff reheating with ω_reh>1/3, or negative-energy towers, all hard to motivate from UV completions.

  2. Gravitational Baryogenesis in $f(R)$ Cosmologies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gravitational baryogenesis in Starobinsky and Odintsov–Oikonomou f(R) inflation yields η≈(1.05–1.53)×10⁻¹¹ at M*=M_Pl, matching the observed 8.65×10⁻¹¹ only for M*≈0.4 M_Pl.

  3. How Accidental was Inflation?

    hep-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A small, string-theoretically plausible deformation of the Starobinsky potential (lambda about 0.9999) fits the Planck plus ACT and DESI value of the spectral tilt better than the pure Starobinsky model, and introduce...

  4. Starobinsky Inflation with T-Model Kaehler Geometries

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Starobinsky-like inflation is embedded in supergravity via T-model Kähler potentials, yielding ns in the range 0.961 to 0.969 and a tensor-to-scalar ratio that rises with Kähler curvature.

Pith tools