REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantum Computing Solution of DC Power Flow
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we model and solve a fundamental power system problem, i.e., DC power flow, using a practical quantum computer. The Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) quantum algorithm is used to solve the DC power flow problem. The HHL algorithm for the solution of a system of linear equations (SLE) offers an exponential speedup over the classical computers. The speedup advantage is more significant when the size and the frequency of solving the power flow problem become more substantial. Verified quantum computing applications to power systems are merely nonexistent at this point. Through this paper, we plan to (1) provide a proof-of-concept that practical power system problems can be solved using quantum technology, (2) build a quantum-grid foundation by solving a fundamental power system problem with applications in many other critical grid problems, and (3) apply HHL to solve an SLE which has broad applications in many power system problems. A small 3-bus system is used for testing and demonstration purposes, considering the limitations of the available quantum computing hardware and software. The proposed method's merits and effectiveness are demonstrated using IBM open-source quantum computer and reported through proof-of-concept experimental demonstration using a 4-qubit quantum information processor.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Benchmarking Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms for Power Grid Optimization Problems
For AC-OPF-UC instances with 5-13 generators, the qubit-efficient hybrid VQA does not outperform uniform random bitstring sampling on ideal-time quantum hardware.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.