Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 5 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2010.05137.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T12:45:18.940764Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T00:20:54.895669Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 024dd819-cad6-4501-8a0a-ebaa415fc6e6 · inbound
SocialMaze: A Benchmark for Evaluating Social Reasoning in Large Language Models cites this paper.
SocialMaze: A Benchmark for Evaluating Social Reasoning in Large Language Models An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 80
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T12:45:18.940764Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation be01eed1-a832-4b38-a5c1-edbcfa239c97 · inbound
Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews cites this paper.
Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 2
- Resolution
- malformed identifier
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T00:20:54.906349Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.
Observation 504a3264-05e4-4aa7-98f2-7ff4b75b31a1 · inbound
Catalyst Papers in Artificial Intelligence Research: A Landscape on ICLR from 2017 to 2025 cites this paper.
Catalyst Papers in Artificial Intelligence Research: A Landscape on ICLR from 2017 to 2025 An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 25
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-07-12T16:04:50.429639Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 25b553ae-e087-4a49-b914-f6d9f1adc4bb · inbound
Bias at the Borderline: Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt in Peer Review? cites this paper.
Bias at the Borderline: Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt in Peer Review? An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 61
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T00:21:42.231938Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 20530eae-719f-44c8-a57e-eca9e5839c1a · inbound
Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review cites this paper.
Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
Reference 2017
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T15:15:45.919458Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.