Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Elucidating cosmological model dependence with $H_0$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08565 v3 pith:P7IBKKEL submitted 2021-01-21 astro-ph.CO hep-th

classification astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords cosmologicalerrorshubblemodelmodelsanalysisbecomecomment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We observe that the errors on the Hubble constant $H_0$, a universal parameter in any FLRW cosmology, can be larger in specific cosmological models than Gaussian Processes (GP) data reconstruction. We comment on the prior mean function and trace the smaller GP errors to stronger correlations, which we show precludes all well studied dynamical dark energy models. Our analysis suggests that "cosmological model independence", especially in the statement of Hubble tension, has become a misnomer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Model-independent late-universe measurements of $H_0$ and $\Omega_K$ with the parametrization based on cosmic age-improved inverse distance ladder

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A cosmic-age-based inverse distance ladder with DESI DR2, DESY5, SGL, CC and GRB data gives H0=71.59±0.94 km/s/Mpc and ΩK=0.001±0.038.

  2. Cosmo-Learn: code for learning cosmology using different methods and mock data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An open-source toolkit that simulates late-universe cosmological observations and benchmarks MCMC, genetic algorithms, Gaussian processes, Bayesian ridge regression, and neural networks in one pipeline.

  3. Crosschecking Cosmic Distances from DESI BAO and DES SNe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For DESI DR2 BAO versus DES SNe, the comoving-distance ratio is flat but the inverse-Hubble-distance ratio falls with redshift at 2.3–2.5σ, which the authors attribute to systematics.

  4. Is $\omega_0 \omega_a$CDM a good model for the clumpy Universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Against a Gaussian-process reconstruction of 15 sigma8(z) measurements, the DESI w0waCDM model fits slightly better than LambdaCDM, but the difference is tiny and the comparison metric is biased.

  5. Determination of cosmic curvature independent of the sound horizon and $H_0$ using BOSS/eBOSS and DESI DR1 BAO observations

    astro-ph.CO 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using BOSS/eBOSS and DESI DR1 BAO data plus cosmic chronometers, the authors obtain Omega_K = -0.040 (+0.142 / -0.145) with Gaussian-process reconstruction, consistent with a flat universe.

  6. Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 unverdicted

    A review of the cosmic chronometer method: differential ages of massive passive galaxies yield cosmology-independent H(z) measurements, now at about 5% accuracy at z~0.5 and potentially percent-level H0 with future surveys.

Pith tools