REVIEW 1 cited by
Multi-Objective Learning to Predict Pareto Fronts Using Hypervolume Maximization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Real-world problems are often multi-objective with decision-makers unable to specify a priori which trade-off between the conflicting objectives is preferable. Intuitively, building machine learning solutions in such cases would entail providing multiple predictions that span and uniformly cover the Pareto front of all optimal trade-off solutions. We propose a novel approach for multi-objective training of neural networks to approximate the Pareto front during inference. In our approach, the neural networks are trained multi-objectively using a dynamic loss function, wherein each network's losses (corresponding to multiple objectives) are weighted by their hypervolume maximizing gradients. We discuss and illustrate why training processes to approximate Pareto fronts need to optimize on fronts of individual training samples instead of on only the front of average losses. Experiments on three multi-objective problems show that our approach returns outputs that are well-spread across different trade-offs on the approximated Pareto front without requiring the trade-off vectors to be specified a priori. Further, results of comparisons with the state-of-the-art approaches highlight the added value of our proposed approach, especially in asymmetric Pareto fronts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Voronoi-grid-based Pareto Front Learning and Its Application to Collaborative Federated Learning
Voronoi-grid sampling with a distance penalty produces Pareto fronts with higher hypervolume and better boundary coverage than existing Pareto front learning methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.