Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Detecting Neutrino Mass by Combining Matter Clustering, Halos, and Voids

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.05049 v2 pith:JZOINGEP submitted 2021-02-09 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalmassneutrinoconstraintsomegaparametersthreeanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We quantify the information content of the non-linear matter power spectrum, the halo mass function, and the void size function, using the Quijote $N$-body simulations. We find that these three statistics exhibit very different degeneracies amongst the cosmological parameters, and thus the combination of all three probes enables the breaking of degeneracies, in turn yielding remarkably tight constraints. We perform a Fisher analysis using the full covariance matrix, including all auto- and cross-correlations, finding that this increases the information content for neutrino mass compared to a correlation-free analysis. The multiplicative improvement of the constraints on the cosmological parameters obtained by combining all three probes compared to using the power spectrum alone are: 137, 5, 8, 20, 10, and 43, for $\Omega_m$, $\Omega_b$, $h$, $n_s$, $\sigma_8$, and $M_\nu$, respectively. The marginalized error on the sum of the neutrino masses is $\sigma(M_\nu)=0.018\,{\rm eV}$ for a cosmological volume of $1\,(h^{-1}{\rm Gpc})^3$, using $k_{\max}=0.5\,h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, and without CMB priors. We note that this error is an underestimate insomuch as we do not consider super-sample covariance, baryonic effects, and realistic survey noises and systematics. On the other hand, it is an overestimate insomuch as our cuts and binning are suboptimal due to restrictions imposed by the simulation resolution. Given upcoming galaxy surveys will observe volumes spanning $\sim 100\,(h^{-1}{\rm Gpc})^3$, this presents a promising new avenue to measure neutrino mass without being restricted by the need for accurate knowledge of the optical depth, which is required for CMB-based measurements. Furthermore, the improved constraints on other cosmological parameters, notably $\Omega_m$, may also be competitive with CMB-based measurements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Cosmic Voids Matter: Pristine Evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cosmic voids traced by halos become stable at late times, and the matter around them evolves linearly, supporting their use as clean dark-energy probes.

  2. Cosmic voids evolution in modified gravity via hydrodynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Voids in luminal Galileon gravity are always unscreened, and a reality requirement on the fifth force rules out ~82% of the favored parameter space, yielding a redshift-dependent minimum void depth.

  3. Probing massive neutrinos and modified gravity with redshift-space morphologies and anisotropies of large-scale structure

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a dark-matter-only simulation forecast, combining power spectrum multipoles with Minkowski functionals and tensors tightens constraints on neutrino mass and f(R) gravity parameters by factors of 1.5 to 3.4.

  4. Can cosmic voids ease the Hubble tension? Local expansion in $w_0w_a$CDM

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A KBC-like local void lowers the SH0ES–Planck Hubble tension to about 2σ but cannot fully resolve it, and evolving dark energy shifts the required void depth by only ~1%.

Pith tools