REVIEW 2 cited by
Intermediate Layer Optimization for Inverse Problems using Deep Generative Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We propose Intermediate Layer Optimization (ILO), a novel optimization algorithm for solving inverse problems with deep generative models. Instead of optimizing only over the initial latent code, we progressively change the input layer obtaining successively more expressive generators. To explore the higher dimensional spaces, our method searches for latent codes that lie within a small $l_1$ ball around the manifold induced by the previous layer. Our theoretical analysis shows that by keeping the radius of the ball relatively small, we can improve the established error bound for compressed sensing with deep generative models. We empirically show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods introduced in StyleGAN-2 and PULSE for a wide range of inverse problems including inpainting, denoising, super-resolution and compressed sensing.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CENSOR: Defense Against Gradient Inversion via Orthogonal Subspace Bayesian Sampling
CENSOR defends federated learning against gradient inversion by transmitting a loss-optimized random gradient orthogonal to the true gradient, but its security claim is not established against adaptive adversaries.
-
Revisiting the Privacy Risks of Split Inference: A GAN-Based Data Reconstruction Attack via Progressive Feature Optimization
PFO improves GAN-based split-inference reconstruction via progressive intermediate-feature optimization, but its quantitative claims rest on internally inconsistent metric tables.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.