REVIEW 2 cited by
Dark sector interactions and the curvature of the Universe in light of Planck's 2018 data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We investigate the observational viability of a class of interacting dark energy (iDE) models in the light of the latest Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), type Ia supernovae (SNe) and SH0ES Hubble parameter measurements. Our analysis explores the assumption of a non-zero spatial curvature, the correlation between the interaction parameter $\alpha$ and the current expansion rate $H_0$, and updates the results reported in \cite{micol}. Initially, assuming a spatially flat universe, the results show that the best-fit of our joint analysis clearly favours a positive interaction, i.e., an energy flux from dark matter to dark energy, with $\alpha \approx 0.2$, while the non-interacting case, $\alpha = 0$, is ruled out by more than $3\sigma$ confidence level. On the other hand, considering a non-zero spatial curvature, we find a slight preference for a negative value of the curvature parameter, which seems to relax the correlation between the parameters $\alpha$ and $H_0$, as well as between $H_0$ and the normalization of the matter power spectrum on scales of 8$h^{-1}$ Mpc ($\sigma_8$). Finally, we discuss the influence of considering the SH$0$ES prior on $H_0$ in the joint analyses, and find that such a choice does not change considerably the standard cosmology predictions but has a significant influence on the results of the iDE model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension
Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.
-
Quasar cosmology II: joint analyses with Cosmic Microwave Background
Quasar, supernova, BAO, DES, and CMB data are jointly compatible only in an interacting dark-energy model, not in Lambda-CDM, wCDM, or CPL.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.