Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.09430 v3 pith:ZXWBTKDH submitted 2021-03-17 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords graphdatasetslarge-scaleogb-lsclearningbaselinechallengededicated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Enabling effective and efficient machine learning (ML) over large-scale graph data (e.g., graphs with billions of edges) can have a great impact on both industrial and scientific applications. However, existing efforts to advance large-scale graph ML have been largely limited by the lack of a suitable public benchmark. Here we present OGB Large-Scale Challenge (OGB-LSC), a collection of three real-world datasets for facilitating the advancements in large-scale graph ML. The OGB-LSC datasets are orders of magnitude larger than existing ones, covering three core graph learning tasks -- link prediction, graph regression, and node classification. Furthermore, we provide dedicated baseline experiments, scaling up expressive graph ML models to the massive datasets. We show that expressive models significantly outperform simple scalable baselines, indicating an opportunity for dedicated efforts to further improve graph ML at scale. Moreover, OGB-LSC datasets were deployed at ACM KDD Cup 2021 and attracted more than 500 team registrations globally, during which significant performance improvements were made by a variety of innovative techniques. We summarize the common techniques used by the winning solutions and highlight the current best practices in large-scale graph ML. Finally, we describe how we have updated the datasets after the KDD Cup to further facilitate research advances. The OGB-LSC datasets, baseline code, and all the information about the KDD Cup are available at https://ogb.stanford.edu/docs/lsc/ .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cross-Resolution Semantic Learning for Graph Domain Adaptation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CReSL improves graph domain adaptation by learning cross-resolution source-to-target routing and grafting target representations toward source class prototypes.

  2. Mayura: Exploiting Similarities in Motifs for Temporal Co-Mining

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mayura introduces the MG-Tree, a hierarchical prefix tree over temporal motifs, enabling exact co-mining of multiple motifs with 1.7-2.4x average speedups on GPU/CPU.

  3. A Benchmark for Quantum Chemistry Relaxations via Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

    q-bio.QM 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PubChemQCR is a large public dataset of DFT-based molecular relaxation trajectories with energy and force labels, benchmarked with nine machine learning interatomic potentials.

  4. OmniVec2 -- A Novel Transformer based Network for Large Scale Multimodal and Multitask Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A shared-backbone transformer with pairwise modality training reports top results across 25 datasets spanning 12 modalities.

  5. MolVision: Molecular Property Prediction with Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a rendered molecular image to the SMILES prompt of a vision-language model improves molecular property prediction, and a Tanimoto-similarity contrastive fine-tuning step boosts the gains.

  6. Are We Really Measuring Progress? Transferring Insights from Evaluating Recommender Systems to Temporal Link Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Temporal link prediction benchmarks can rank models differently depending on sampling and aggregation choices, so current progress measurements are not reliable.

  7. Graph Prompting for Graph Learning Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of graph prompting methods that categorizes them by the stage at which prompts are applied: data, representation, or task.

Pith tools