REVIEW 3 cited by
HW-NAS-Bench:Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
HardWare-aware Neural Architecture Search (HW-NAS) has recently gained tremendous attention by automating the design of DNNs deployed in more resource-constrained daily life devices. Despite its promising performance, developing optimal HW-NAS solutions can be prohibitively challenging as it requires cross-disciplinary knowledge in the algorithm, micro-architecture, and device-specific compilation. First, to determine the hardware-cost to be incorporated into the NAS process, existing works mostly adopt either pre-collected hardware-cost look-up tables or device-specific hardware-cost models. Both of them limit the development of HW-NAS innovations and impose a barrier-to-entry to non-hardware experts. Second, similar to generic NAS, it can be notoriously difficult to benchmark HW-NAS algorithms due to their significant required computational resources and the differences in adopted search spaces, hyperparameters, and hardware devices. To this end, we develop HW-NAS-Bench, the first public dataset for HW-NAS research which aims to democratize HW-NAS research to non-hardware experts and make HW-NAS research more reproducible and accessible. To design HW-NAS-Bench, we carefully collected the measured/estimated hardware performance of all the networks in the search spaces of both NAS-Bench-201 and FBNet, on six hardware devices that fall into three categories (i.e., commercial edge devices, FPGA, and ASIC). Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the collected measurements in HW-NAS-Bench to provide insights for HW-NAS research. Finally, we demonstrate exemplary user cases to (1) show that HW-NAS-Bench allows non-hardware experts to perform HW-NAS by simply querying it and (2) verify that dedicated device-specific HW-NAS can indeed lead to optimal accuracy-cost trade-offs. The codes and all collected data are available at https://github.com/RICE-EIC/HW-NAS-Bench.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LEMUR 2: Unlocking Neural Network Diversity for AI
LEMUR 2 releases a multi-generator, multi-task neural-architecture corpus with real-device latency metadata intended as fuel for LLM-driven AutoML.
-
Filling the Pareto-Optimal Front for Affordance Segmentation on Embedded Devices Using RGB-D Cameras
HW-NAS with an RGB-D search space and a cheap depth-to-RGB fine-tune layer yield mid-size networks that often sit on the accuracy–FLOPs/params Pareto front and run real-time on a Jetson Nano.
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Agentic AI and Agentification: Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions
A survey that organizes agentic AI for 6G edge networks into four pillars, compactness, efficiency, knowledge and reasoning, and migration, and illustrates them with prior case studies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.