REVIEW 2 cited by
A novel strategy for searching for $C\!P$ violations in the baryon sector
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Despite the large baryon-anti-baryon asymmetry in the observable Universe, the closely related phenomenon -- the violation of the combined charge and parity symmetry ($C\!P$V) -- has not been observed in the baryon sector in laboratories. In this paper, a new strategy for searching for $C\!P$V in heavy hadron multi-body decays is proposed, in which a set of novel observables measuring $C\!P$V in such decays -- the partial wave $C\!P$ asymmetries (PW$C\!P$As) -- are introduced. This strategy is model-independent and applicable to multi-body decays of heavy hadrons with arbitrary spin configurations in both initial and final states, and with any number of particles in the final state. It is especially applicable for $C\!P$V investigations in multi-body decays of heavy baryons. As applications of this strategy, we suggest to measure the PW$C\!P$As in some decay channels of bottom baryons such as $\Lambda_b^0\to p \pi^-\pi^+\pi^-$, $\Lambda_b\to p K^- \pi^+\pi^-$, $\Lambda^0_b\to p\pi^-K^+K^-$, $\Lambda_b^0\to\Lambda K^+\pi^-$, and $\Lambda_b^0\to p \pi^- K_s$.}
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CP violation observables in baryon decays
Time-reversal-odd CP observables in baryon decays are proportional to the cosine of strong-phase differences, so they complement sine-suppressed direct CP asymmetries.
-
New horizon in particle physics: first observation of CP violation in baryon decays
A commentary noting that LHCb's 6-sigma baryon CP violation measurement in Lambda_b to pK-pi+pi- matches a 5.6-5.9% prediction from N-pi rescattering, but contributing no new analysis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.