REVIEW 2 cited by
Pairwise Adjusted Mutual Information
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A well-known metric for quantifying the similarity between two clusterings is the adjusted mutual information. Compared to mutual information, a corrective term based on random permutations of the labels is introduced, preventing two clusterings being similar by chance. Unfortunately, this adjustment makes the metric computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose a novel adjustment based on {pairwise} label permutations instead of full label permutations. Specifically, we consider permutations where only two samples, selected uniformly at random, exchange their labels. We show that the corresponding adjusted metric, which can be expressed explicitly, behaves similarly to the standard adjusted mutual information for assessing the quality of a clustering, while having a much lower time complexity. Both metrics are compared in terms of quality and performance on experiments based on synthetic and real data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Do Large Language Models Understand Morality Across Cultures?
Small language models compress cross-cultural moral differences, producing more uniformly permissive and less varied judgments than international survey data.
-
LLMs as mirrors of societal moral standards: reflection of cultural divergence and agreement across ethical topics
Across five LLMs and two global surveys, model-generated moral judgments poorly matched cross-cultural patterns of agreement and disagreement.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.