REVIEW 1 cited by
Failing Conceptually: Concept-Based Explanations of Dataset Shift
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Despite their remarkable performance on a wide range of visual tasks, machine learning technologies often succumb to data distribution shifts. Consequently, a range of recent work explores techniques for detecting these shifts. Unfortunately, current techniques offer no explanations about what triggers the detection of shifts, thus limiting their utility to provide actionable insights. In this work, we present Concept Bottleneck Shift Detection (CBSD): a novel explainable shift detection method. CBSD provides explanations by identifying and ranking the degree to which high-level human-understandable concepts are affected by shifts. Using two case studies (dSprites and 3dshapes), we demonstrate how CBSD can accurately detect underlying concepts that are affected by shifts and achieve higher detection accuracy compared to state-of-the-art shift detection methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Avoiding Leakage Poisoning: Concept Interventions Under Distribution Shifts
Concept-bottleneck models with information bypasses can be 'poisoned' by out-of-distribution leakage, so expert concept corrections fail; the proposed MixCEM gates leakage by concept uncertainty and keeps intervention...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.