REVIEW 8 cited by
Non-Gaussian estimates of tensions in cosmological parameters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We discuss how to efficiently and reliably estimate the level of agreement and disagreement on parameter determinations from different experiments, fully taking into account non-Gaussianities in the parameter posteriors. We develop two families of scalable algorithms that allow us to perform this type of calculations in increasing number of dimensions and for different levels of tensions. One family of algorithms rely on kernel density estimates of posterior distributions while the other relies on machine learning modeling of the posterior distribution with normalizing flows. We showcase their effectiveness and accuracy with a set of benchmark examples and find both methods agree with each other and the true tension within $0.5\sigma$ in difficult cases and generally to $0.2\sigma$ or better. This allows us to study the level of internal agreement between different measurements of the clustering of cosmological structures from the Dark Energy Survey and their agreement with measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background from the Planck satellite.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
The $H_0$ world cup. II. A comprehensive competition between proposed Hubble tension solutions
Against a common 2025-26 dataset (Planck PR4, ACT DR6, SPT-3G, DESI DR2, Pantheon+), early dark energy and early modified gravity models win the H0 competition (~3σ residual tension), while radiation and late-time sol...
-
Cosmology from Planck CMB Lensing and DESI DR1 Quasar Tomography
DESI DR1 quasars cross-correlated with Planck PR4 lensing give sigma8 = 0.929 and S8 = 0.922, about 1.5 sigma above Planck's LCDM prediction, and a sound-horizon-free H0 = 69.1 km/s/Mpc.
-
Tuning the cosmic instrument: robust cosmology through combined probes
Low-redshift large-scale structure data pull the dark-energy equation-of-state posterior toward a cosmological constant and yield S8=0.777±0.017.
-
The $H_0$ World Cup. I. Summary of the baseline group stage results
In a systematic head-to-head analysis, early dark energy and early modified gravity models reduce the Hubble tension to about 3σ and are favored over ΛCDM, while radiation and late-time alternatives are not.
-
Statistical consistency of sign-switching vacuum energy with cosmological observations
Using exact non-Gaussian shift and posterior predictive tests, ΛsCDM improves CMB–BAO consistency and softens but does not resolve the Hubble tension, which persists at p≈4×10⁻⁴.
-
Running of the spectral index: Reconciling the CMB with the Lyman-$\alpha$ Forest
Combining Planck, ACT, SPT-3G and eBOSS data, the authors report a ~2σ preference for a nonzero second derivative of the primordial spectral index and show that featureful inflationary potentials fit the data better t...
-
Machine Learning Assisted Parameter-Space Searches for Lensed Gravitational Waves
Normalizing flow based non-Gaussian consistency tests in a compressed detector basis select GW170104-GW170814 as the only promising lensed pair in GWTC-3.
-
Scalar field dark energy models: Current and forecast constraints
Combining BAO, CMB, weak lensing, supernova, and strong-lensing data, the authors infer w0 = -0.904 +/- 0.034 for thawing scalar-field dark energy, 2.9 sigma from LCDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.