Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The study of $\gamma\gamma\to\gamma\psi(2S)$ at Belle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.06605 v3 pith:Y2ES7KQR submitted 2021-05-14 hep-ex

X. L. Wang , B. S. Gao , W. J. Zhu , I. Adachi , H. Aihara , S. Al Said , D. M. Asner , H. Atmacan
show 195 more authors
V. Aulchenko T. Aushev R. Ayad V. Babu S. Bahinipati P. Behera V. Bhardwaj B. Bhuyan T. Bilka J. Biswal A. Bobrov G. Bonvicini A. Bozek M. Bračko M. Campajola D. Červenkov M.-C. Chang V. Chekelian A. Chen B. G. Cheon K. Chilikin H. E. Cho K. Cho S.-K. Choi Y. Choi S. Choudhury D. Cinabro S. Cunliffe S. Das G. De Nardo R. Dhamija F. Di Capua Z. Doležal T. V. Dong S. Eidelman T. Ferber D. Ferlewicz A. Frey B. G. Fulsom R. Garg V. Gaur N. Gabyshev A. Garmash A. Giri P. Goldenzweig B. Golob C. Hadjivasiliou T. Hara O. Hartbrich K. Hayasaka H. Hayashii M. T. Hedges W.-S. Hou C.-L. Hsu T. Iijima K. Inami A. Ishikawa R. Itoh M. Iwasaki Y. Iwasaki W. W. Jacobs S. Jia Y. Jin C. W. Joo K. K. Joo J. Kahn K. H. Kang T. Kawasaki C. Kiesling C. H. Kim D. Y. Kim S. H. Kim Y.-K. Kim P. Kodyš T. Konno A. Korobov S. Korpar E. Kovalenko P. Križan R. Kroeger P. Krokovny R. Kulasiri M. Kumar R. Kumar K. Kumara A. Kuzmin Y.-J. Kwon K. Lalwani J. S. Lange I. S. Lee S. C. Lee P. Lewis J. Li L. K. Li Y. B. Li L. Li Gioi J. Libby K. Lieret D. Liventsev C. MacQueen M. Masuda T. Matsuda D. Matvienko M. Merola F. Metzner K. Miyabayashi R. Mizuk G. B. Mohanty M. Mrvar R. Mussa M. Nakao Z. Natkaniec A. Natochii L. Nayak M. Nayak M. Niiyama N. K. Nisar S. Nishida K. Nishimura S. Ogawa H. Ono Y. Onuki P. Oskin P. Pakhlov G. Pakhlova T. Pang S. Pardi H. Park S.-H. Park S. Patra S. Paul T. K. Pedlar R. Pestotnik L. E. Piilonen T. Podobnik V. Popov E. Prencipe M. T. Prim M. Röhrken A. Rostomyan N. Rout G. Russo D. Sahoo S. Sandilya A. Sangal L. Santelj T. Sanuki G. Schnell C. Schwanda Y. Seino K. Senyo M. E. Sevior M. Shapkin C. Sharma C. P. Shen J.-G. Shiu B. Shwartz F. Simon J. B. Singh A. Sokolov E. Solovieva S. Stanič M. Starič Z. S. Stottler M. Sumihama M. Takizawa U. Tamponi F. Tenchini M. Uchida S. Uehara T. Uglov Y. Unno S. Uno P. Urquijo Y. Usov R. Van Tonder G. Varner A. Vossen E. Waheed C. H. Wang M.-Z. Wang P. Wang M. Watanabe S. Watanuki O. Werbycka E. Won X. Xu W. Yan S. B. Yang H. Ye J. H. Yin C. Z. Yuan Z. P. Zhang V. Zhilich V. Zhukova
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords gammafirstsecondbelledeterminedlambdasigmasignificance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Using $980~\rm fb^{-1}$ of data on and around the $\Upsilon(nS)(n=1,2,3,4,5)$ resonances collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider, the two-photon process $\gamma\gamma\to \gamma\psi(2S)$ is studied from the threshold to $4.2~{\rm GeV}$ for the first time. Two structures are seen in the invariant mass distribution of $\gamma\psi(2S)$: one at $M_{R_1} = 3922.4\pm 6.5 \pm 2.0~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ with a width of $\Gamma_{R_1} = 22\pm 17\pm 4~{\rm MeV}$, and another at $M_{R_2} = 4014.3\pm 4.0 \pm 1.5~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ with a width of $\Gamma_{R_2} = 4\pm 11 \pm 6~{\rm MeV}$; the signals are parametrized with the incoherent sum of two Breit-Wigner functions. The first structure is consistent with the $X(3915)$ or the $\chi_{c2}(3930)$, and the local statistical significance is determined to be $3.1\sigma$ with the systematic uncertainties included. The second matches none of the known charmonium or charmoniumlike states, and its global significance is determined to be $2.8\sigma$ including the look-elsewhere effect. The production rates are $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}{\cal B}(R_1\to\gamma\psi(2S)) = 9.8\pm 3.6\pm 1.2~{\rm eV}$ assuming $(J^{PC}, |\lambda|) =(0^{++}, 0)$ or $2.0\pm 0.7\pm 0.2~{\rm eV}$ with $(2^{++}, 2)$ for the first structure and $\Gamma_{\gamma\gamma}{\cal B}(R_2\to\gamma\psi(2S)) = 6.2\pm 2.2\pm 0.8~{\rm eV}$ with $(0^{++}, 0)$ or $1.2\pm 0.4\pm 0.2~{\rm eV}$ with $(2^{++}, 2)$ for the second one. Here, the first errors are statistical and the second systematic, and $\lambda$ is the helicity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools