REVIEW 2 cited by
Heavy baryon spectrum with chiral multiplets of scalar and vector diquarks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Chiral effective theory of scalar and vector diquarks is formulated according to the linear sigma model. The main application is to describe the ground and excited states of singly heavy baryons with a charm or bottom quark. Applying the potential quark model between the diquark and the heavy quark ($Q=c, b$), we construct a heavy-quark--diquark model. The spectra of the positive- and negative-parity states of $\Lambda_Q$, $\Sigma_Q$, $\Xi^{(')}_Q$ and $\Omega_Q$ are obtained. The masses and interaction parameters of the effective theory are fixed partly from the lattice QCD data and also from fitting low-lying heavy baryon masses. We find that the negative parity excited states of $\Xi_Q$ (flavor $\bar{\bf 3}$) are different from those of $\Lambda_Q$, because of the inverse hierarchy of the pseudoscalar diquark. On the other hand, $\Sigma_Q, \Xi'_Q$ and $\Omega_Q$ (flavor ${\bf 6}$) baryons have similar spectra. We compare our results of the heavy-quark--diquark model with experimental data as well as the quark model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fate of $\Sigma_c$, $\Xi_c'$ and $\Omega_c$ baryons at high temperature with chiral restoration
At high temperature, parity partners of singly charmed baryons become degenerate, Sigma_c and Omega_c masses converge, and the Sigma_c to Lambda_c pi width closes.
-
Chiral effective theory of scalar and vector diquarks revisited
A new term in the chiral diquark Lagrangian is shown to control the mass ordering of pseudoscalar diquarks and to set the threshold at which heavy-baryon decays turn off under chiral restoration.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.