REVIEW 1 cited by
Do we need to use regularization on the thermal part in the NJL model?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model is one of the most useful tools to study non-perturbative strong interaction matter. Because it is a nonrenormalizable model, the choosing of regularization is a subtle issue. In this paper, we discuss one of the general things of the regularization in the NJL model, which is whether we need to use the regularization on the thermal part by evaluating the quark chiral condensate and thermal properties in the two-flavor NJL model. The calculations in this work include three regularization schemes that contain both gauge covariant and invariant schemes. We found no matter which regularization scheme we choose, it is necessary to use the regularization on the thermal part when calculating the chiral condensate related physics quantities and do not use the regularization on the thermal part when calculating the grand potential related physical quantities.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Thermomagnetic Effects of Quark Matter in the NJL Model: Application of Regularization Schemes
In the SU(3) NJL model, the choice among magnetic field-independent, soft cut-off, and Pauli-Villars regularization strongly changes pressure, specific heat, and sound speed of hot magnetized quark matter, and regular...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.