Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Cosmic expansion parametrization: Implication for curvature and $\text{H}_{0}$ tension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.02963 v2 pith:Z6XBKLCW submitted 2021-06-05 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords shoescosmichubbleparameterlateomegatensiontime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We propose an analytical parametrization of the comoving distance and Hubble parameter to study the cosmic expansion history beyond the vanilla $\Lambda$CDM model. The parametrization is generalized enough to include the contribution of spatial curvature and to capture the higher redshift behaviors. With this parameterization, we study the late time cosmic behavior and put constraints on the cosmological parameters like present values of Hubble parameter ($H_{0}$), matter energy density parameter ($\Omega_{m0}$), spatial curvature energy density parameter ($\Omega_{k0}$) and baryonic matter energy density parameter ($\Omega_{b0}$) using different combinations data like CMB (Cosmic microwave background), BAO (baryon acoustic oscillation), and SN (Pantheon sample for type Ia supernovae). We also rigorously study the Hubble tension in the framework of late time modification from the standard $\Lambda$CDM model. We find that the late time modification of the cosmic expansion can solve the Hubble tension between CMB $\&$ SHOES (local distance ladder observation for $H_{0}$), between CMB+BAO $\&$ SHOES and between CMB+SN $\&$ SHOES, but the late time modification can not solve the Hubble tension between CMB+BAO+SN and SHOES. That means CMB, BAO, and SN data combined put strong enough constraints on $H_{0}$ (even with varying $\Omega_{k0}$) and on other background cosmological parameters so that the addition of $H_{0}$ prior from SHOES (or from similar other local distance observations) can not significantly pull the $H_{0}$ value towards the corresponding SHOES value.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

  2. Physical vs phantom dark energy after DESI: thawing quintessence in a curved background

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Curved thawing quintessence models fit DESI DR2 BAO, CMB, and Pantheon+ data as well as the flat w0-wa parametrization, so phantom crossing is model-dependent rather than required.

  3. Impact of DESI BAO Data on Inflationary Parameters: stability against late-time new physics

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using CMB, supernova, and DESI BAO data, this study finds that inflationary parameters n_s and A_s remain stable (shifts under 1%) when SDSS BAO data is replaced by DESI BAO data across several late-time models.

  4. Constraints on DBI dark energy with chameleon mechanism

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    DBI dark energy with a chameleon coupling is mildly disfavored against ΛCDM using DESI DR2, DES Y5, Pantheon Plus, and Planck data, with self-interaction consistent with zero.

Pith tools