REVIEW 4 cited by
KL Guided Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Domain adaptation is an important problem and often needed for real-world applications. In this problem, instead of i.i.d. training and testing datapoints, we assume that the source (training) data and the target (testing) data have different distributions. With that setting, the empirical risk minimization training procedure often does not perform well, since it does not account for the change in the distribution. A common approach in the domain adaptation literature is to learn a representation of the input that has the same (marginal) distribution over the source and the target domain. However, these approaches often require additional networks and/or optimizing an adversarial (minimax) objective, which can be very expensive or unstable in practice. To improve upon these marginal alignment techniques, in this paper, we first derive a generalization bound for the target loss based on the training loss and the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the source and the target representation distributions. Based on this bound, we derive an algorithm that minimizes the KL term to obtain a better generalization to the target domain. We show that with a probabilistic representation network, the KL term can be estimated efficiently via minibatch samples without any additional network or a minimax objective. This leads to a theoretically sound alignment method which is also very efficient and stable in practice. Experimental results also suggest that our method outperforms other representation-alignment approaches.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
On the Hardness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: Optimal Learners and Information-Theoretic Perspective
Under a Bayesian model of domain adaptation, the paper derives the optimal learner and shows that the posterior label entropy (PTLU) lower-bounds the target risk, providing a new hardness measure.
-
Subgroups Matter for Robust Bias Mitigation
Subgroup choice determines whether bias mitigation helps or hurts, and the minimum KL divergence to the unbiased test distribution predicts success.
-
On the Transferability and Discriminability of Repersentation Learning in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
RLGLC combines a relaxed Wasserstein alignment with a contrastive local consistency term for UDA and reports SOTA results, but the proof that such a term is necessary is not rigorous.
-
Unified Alignment Protocol: Making Sense of the Unlabeled Data in New Domains
UAP, an alternating two-stage training protocol, improves unseen-domain accuracy in semi-supervised federated learning by aligning client and server features to a Gaussian distribution defined by the classifier weights.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.