Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

KL Guided Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.07780 v2 pith:IMJDUUTA submitted 2021-06-14 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords domaintargettrainingadaptationoftenrepresentationsourceadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Domain adaptation is an important problem and often needed for real-world applications. In this problem, instead of i.i.d. training and testing datapoints, we assume that the source (training) data and the target (testing) data have different distributions. With that setting, the empirical risk minimization training procedure often does not perform well, since it does not account for the change in the distribution. A common approach in the domain adaptation literature is to learn a representation of the input that has the same (marginal) distribution over the source and the target domain. However, these approaches often require additional networks and/or optimizing an adversarial (minimax) objective, which can be very expensive or unstable in practice. To improve upon these marginal alignment techniques, in this paper, we first derive a generalization bound for the target loss based on the training loss and the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the source and the target representation distributions. Based on this bound, we derive an algorithm that minimizes the KL term to obtain a better generalization to the target domain. We show that with a probabilistic representation network, the KL term can be estimated efficiently via minibatch samples without any additional network or a minimax objective. This leads to a theoretically sound alignment method which is also very efficient and stable in practice. Experimental results also suggest that our method outperforms other representation-alignment approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Hardness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: Optimal Learners and Information-Theoretic Perspective

    stat.ML 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under a Bayesian model of domain adaptation, the paper derives the optimal learner and shows that the posterior label entropy (PTLU) lower-bounds the target risk, providing a new hardness measure.

  2. Subgroups Matter for Robust Bias Mitigation

    cs.LG 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Subgroup choice determines whether bias mitigation helps or hurts, and the minimum KL divergence to the unbiased test distribution predicts success.

  3. On the Transferability and Discriminability of Repersentation Learning in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RLGLC combines a relaxed Wasserstein alignment with a contrastive local consistency term for UDA and reports SOTA results, but the proof that such a term is necessary is not rigorous.

  4. Unified Alignment Protocol: Making Sense of the Unlabeled Data in New Domains

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UAP, an alternating two-stage training protocol, improves unseen-domain accuracy in semi-supervised federated learning by aligning client and server features to a Gaussian distribution defined by the classifier weights.

Pith tools