Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Consistent higher order $\sigma(\mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G}\rightarrow h)$, $\Gamma(h \rightarrow \mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G})$ and $\Gamma(h \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)$ in geoSMEFT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.07470 v2 pith:FQG4HAIO submitted 2021-07-15 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords mathcalgammarightarrowresultsconsistentcompletefieldlambda
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We report consistent results for $\Gamma(h \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)$, $\sigma(\mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G}\rightarrow h)$ and $\Gamma(h \rightarrow \mathcal{G} \,\mathcal{G})$ in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) perturbing the SM by corrections $\mathcal{O}(\bar{v}_T^2/16 \pi^2 \Lambda^2)$ in the Background Field Method (BFM) approach to gauge fixing, and to $\mathcal{O}(\bar{v}_T^4/\Lambda^4)$ using the geometric formulation of the SMEFT. We combine and modify recent results in the literature into a complete set of consistent results, uniforming conventions, and simultaneously complete the one loop results for these processes in the BFM. We emphasise calculational scheme dependence present across these processes, and how the operator and loop expansions are not independent beyond leading order. We illustrate several cross checks of consistency in the results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constraining four-heavy-quark operators with top-quark, Higgs, and electroweak precision data

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A combined fit of LHC and LEP data constrains the five four-heavy-quark Wilson coefficients, and shows that gamma5-scheme choices can shift the resulting bounds.

Pith tools