Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.04850 v3 pith:AZS6CKZH submitted 2021-11-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords mathcaltrajectorysqrtalgorithmframeworklearningmodelpreference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the problem of preference based reinforcement learning (PbRL), where, unlike traditional reinforcement learning, an agent receives feedback only in terms of a 1 bit (0/1) preference over a trajectory pair instead of absolute rewards for them. The success of the traditional RL framework crucially relies on the underlying agent-reward model, which, however, depends on how accurately a system designer can express an appropriate reward function and often a non-trivial task. The main novelty of our framework is the ability to learn from preference-based trajectory feedback that eliminates the need to hand-craft numeric reward models. This paper sets up a formal framework for the PbRL problem with non-markovian rewards, where the trajectory preferences are encoded by a generalized linear model of dimension $d$. Assuming the transition model is known, we then propose an algorithm with almost optimal regret guarantee of $\tilde {\mathcal{O}}\left( SH d \log (T / \delta) \sqrt{T} \right)$. We further, extend the above algorithm to the case of unknown transition dynamics, and provide an algorithm with near optimal regret guarantee $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}((\sqrt{d} + H^2 + |\mathcal{S}|)\sqrt{dT} +\sqrt{|\mathcal{S}||\mathcal{A}|TH} )$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is one of the first to give tight regret guarantees for preference based RL problems with trajectory preferences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Online KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation under Misspecification

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Optimistic regression algorithms with Gibbs updates achieve high-probability KL-regret that degrades gracefully under pointwise KL misspecification for bandits and stagewise KL Bellman misspecification for episodic RL.

  2. Outcome-Based Online Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Fundamental Limits

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Outcome-based online RL is tractable under coverability with general function approximation, but there are MDPs where trajectory-level feedback costs exponentially more samples than per-step feedback.

  3. A Unified Theoretical Analysis of Private and Robust Offline Alignment: from RLHF to DPO

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under linear-model assumptions, offline RLHF and DPO both reduce to logistic regression, and privatizing labels before corruption (LTC) carries an extra c(ε) factor in the error bounds compared to corrupting before pr...

  4. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

Pith tools