REVIEW 2 cited by
COHERENT at the Spallation Neutron Source
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory provides an intense, high-quality source of neutrinos from pion decay at rest. This source was recently used for the first measurements of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) by the COHERENT collaboration, resulting in new constraints of beyond-the-standard-model physics. The SNS neutrino source will enable further CEvNS measurements, exploration of inelastic neutrino-nucleus interactions of particular relevance for understanding of supernova neutrinos, and searches for accelerator-produced sub-GeV dark matter. Taking advantage of this unique facility, COHERENT's suite of detectors in "Neutrino Alley'' at the SNS is accumulating more data to address a broad physics program at the intersection of particle physics, nuclear physics, and astrophysics. This review describes COHERENT's first two CEvNS measurements, their interpretation, and the potential of a future physics program at the SNS.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
EFT analysis of New Physics at COHERENT with Dirac neutrinos
COHERENT data can constrain flavor-general new physics in both neutrino production and detection once right-handed Dirac neutrinos are included, and the full rate reduces to a compact set of effective nuclear charges.
-
Prospects for Exploring Non-Standard Neutrino Properties with Argon-Based CEvNS Experiments
Argon CEvNS detectors at stopped-pion sources project sin²θW precision near 1%, neutrino magnetic-moment limits near 10⁻⁹ μB, charge-radius limits near 10⁻³² cm², and vector NSI sensitivity at the 10⁻² level.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.