REVIEW 3 cited by
Federated Learning with Domain Generalization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Federated Learning (FL) enables a group of clients to jointly train a machine learning model with the help of a centralized server. Clients do not need to submit their local data to the server during training, and hence the local training data of clients is protected. In FL, distributed clients collect their local data independently, so the dataset of each client may naturally form a distinct source domain. In practice, the model trained over multiple source domains may have poor generalization performance on unseen target domains. To address this issue, we propose FedADG to equip federated learning with domain generalization capability. FedADG employs the federated adversarial learning approach to measure and align the distributions among different source domains via matching each distribution to a reference distribution. The reference distribution is adaptively generated (by accommodating all source domains) to minimize the domain shift distance during alignment. In FedADG, the alignment is fine-grained since each class is aligned independently. In this way, the learned feature representation is supposed to be universal, so it can generalize well on the unseen domains. Intensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that FedADG has comparable performance with the state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
When Shift Happens - Confounding Is to Blame
Under hidden confounding shifts, predictive information reduces to conditional informativeness minus a residual, a result the authors use to explain ERM's surprising OOD competitiveness and the value of all-covariate models.
-
Optimal Transport-based Domain Alignment as a Preprocessing Step for Federated Learning
Wasserstein barycenter-based color alignment is claimed to boost FedAvg's CIFAR-10 accuracy from ~71% to ~99%, but the evaluation is questionable.
-
Unified Alignment Protocol: Making Sense of the Unlabeled Data in New Domains
UAP, an alternating two-stage training protocol, improves unseen-domain accuracy in semi-supervised federated learning by aligning client and server features to a Gaussian distribution defined by the classifier weights.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.