Electroweak input parameters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.12515 v1 pith:76L25PW7 submitted 2021-11-24 hep-ph

Ilaria Brivio , Sally Dawson , Jorge de Blas , Gauthier Durieux , Pierre Savard (editors) , Ansgar Denner , Ayres Freitas , Chris Hays

show 2 more authors

Ben Pecjak Alessandro Vicini

This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords electroweakinputparametersdifferentdiscussedpredictionspresentlyrecommended

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

Different sets of electroweak input parameters are discussed for SMEFT predictions at the LHC. The {Gmu,mZ,mW} one is presently recommended.

Forward citations

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A search for electroweak $t\bar{t}Wj$ production in multileptonic final states at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector and bounds on effective field theory operators
hep-ex 2025-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

First search for electroweak ttWj production at 13 TeV sets observed (expected) 95% CL upper limits of 251 fb (230 fb) versus the SM prediction of 47.7 fb and constrains the O_Ht and O_HQ^(1) EFT operators.
Constraining four-heavy-quark operators with top-quark, Higgs, and electroweak precision data
hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A combined fit of LHC and LEP data constrains the five four-heavy-quark Wilson coefficients, and shows that gamma5-scheme choices can shift the resulting bounds.