REVIEW 1 cited by
Directional Variations of Cosmological Parameters from the Planck CMB Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Recent observations suggest that there are violations of the isotropy of the universe at large scales, an important part of the cosmological principle. In this paper, we use the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data to search for spatial variations of the cosmological parameters in the $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ model. We fit the Planck temperature angular power spectrum $\mathcal{C}^{TT}_\ell$ for 48 different half-skies, centering on 48 different directions, to search for directional dependences of the standard cosmological parameters. There are $3(2)\sigma$-level directional variations in $\Omega_bh^2$, $\Omega_ch^2$, $n_s$, $100\theta_\mathrm{MC}$, and $H_0$ $(\tau$ and $\ln(10^{10}A_s))$. Furthermore, the directional distributions of the parameters follow a dipole form to good approximation. The Bayes factor between the isotropic and anisotropic hypotheses is $0.0041$, strongly disfavouring the former. The best-fit dipole axes for $\Omega_bh^2$, $\Omega_ch^2$, $n_s$, $100\theta_\mathrm{MC}$, and $A_s e^{-2\tau}$ all generally align with the mean direction of $\boldsymbol{V} \equiv (b = -5.6^{+17.0{\circ}}_{-17.4}, l = 48.8^{+14.3{\circ}}_{-14.4})$, which is roughly perpendicular to the dipole of the variation in fine structure constant, and is about $45^{\circ}$ to the directions of the CMB kinematic dipole, CMB parity asymmetry, and polarization of QSOs. Our results suggest either significant violation of the cosmological principle, or previously unknown systematic errors in the standard CMB analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Illustrating the consequences of a misuse of $\sigma_8$ in cosmology
Cosmologists should compare clustering amplitude with the h-independent statistic sigma_12 instead of sigma_8, because sigma_8's smoothing scale shifts with H0 and artificially worsens the growth tension in high-H0 models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.