Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.12328 v2 pith:FNRMSRHD submitted 2022-01-28 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords privacytrainingaccuracydifferentialimagenetmodelsscaletrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Differential privacy (DP) is the de facto standard for training machine learning (ML) models, including neural networks, while ensuring the privacy of individual examples in the training set. Despite a rich literature on how to train ML models with differential privacy, it remains extremely challenging to train real-life, large neural networks with both reasonable accuracy and privacy. We set out to investigate how to do this, using ImageNet image classification as a poster example of an ML task that is very challenging to resolve accurately with DP right now. This paper shares initial lessons from our effort, in the hope that it will inspire and inform other researchers to explore DP training at scale. We show approaches that help make DP training faster, as well as model types and settings of the training process that tend to work better in the DP setting. Combined, the methods we discuss let us train a Resnet-18 with DP to $47.9\%$ accuracy and privacy parameters $\epsilon = 10, \delta = 10^{-6}$. This is a significant improvement over "naive" DP training of ImageNet models, but a far cry from the $75\%$ accuracy that can be obtained by the same network without privacy. The model we use was pretrained on the Places365 data set as a starting point. We share our code at https://github.com/google-research/dp-imagenet, calling for others to build upon this new baseline to further improve DP at scale.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlating Cross-Iteration Noise for DP-SGD using Model Curvature

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using Hessian eigenvalues from public data to design correlated noise for DP-SGD improves accuracy by 1–4% over current DP-MF methods.

  2. Boosting Gradient Leakage Attacks: Data Reconstruction in Realistic FL Settings

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FedLeak reconstructs high-fidelity images from federated learning gradients at practical batch sizes, without auxiliary data, by matching only the largest gradient components and regularizing the optimization.

  3. Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression with distribution shift, the paper claims that public data never provides complementary value: either public data alone suffices, or (for large shifts) private data a...

  4. The pretraining domain outweighs the training objective in setting the privacy-utility trade-off of differentially private medical image analysis

    cs.CV 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    In DP-SGD chest X-ray classification, MIMIC-CXR supervised pretraining beats ImageNet and DINOv3 initializations, but the study cannot cleanly separate pretraining domain from objective because key comparison arms are...

Pith tools