Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Simple Models and Biased Forecasts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.06921 v5 pith:HZLLMFKP submitted 2022-02-14 econ.TH

classification econ.TH
keywords modelssimpleagentsmodeldataonlytheyadds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a framework in which agents are constrained to use simple models to forecast economic variables and characterizes the resulting biases. It considers agents who can only entertain state-space models with no more than d states, where d measures the intertemporal complexity of a model. Agents are boundedly rational in that they can only consider models that are too simple to capture the true process, yet they use the best model among those considered. Using simple models adds persistence to forward-looking decisions and increases the comovement among them. This mechanism narrows the gap between business-cycle theory and data. In a new neoclassical synthesis model, the assumption that agents use simple models fits the data much better than the rational-expectations hypothesis. Moreover, simple models simultaneously resolve the Barro-King and forward guidance puzzles while improving the propagation of TFP shocks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explaining the Macroeconomic Inertia Puzzle

    econ.GN 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aggregate consumption inertia emerges endogenously in standard heterogeneous-agent models when Bayesian households with unobserved-component expectations misattribute equilibrium amplification to bigger shocks, throug...

  2. The Trouble with Rational Expectations in Heterogeneous Agent Models: A Challenge for Macroeconomics

    econ.GN 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A leading macroeconomist argues that rational expectations about equilibrium prices in heterogeneous-agent models are implausibly complex and should be replaced by simpler, empirically disciplined price forecasts.

Pith tools