REVIEW 2 cited by
Simple Models and Biased Forecasts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper proposes a framework in which agents are constrained to use simple models to forecast economic variables and characterizes the resulting biases. It considers agents who can only entertain state-space models with no more than d states, where d measures the intertemporal complexity of a model. Agents are boundedly rational in that they can only consider models that are too simple to capture the true process, yet they use the best model among those considered. Using simple models adds persistence to forward-looking decisions and increases the comovement among them. This mechanism narrows the gap between business-cycle theory and data. In a new neoclassical synthesis model, the assumption that agents use simple models fits the data much better than the rational-expectations hypothesis. Moreover, simple models simultaneously resolve the Barro-King and forward guidance puzzles while improving the propagation of TFP shocks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Explaining the Macroeconomic Inertia Puzzle
Aggregate consumption inertia emerges endogenously in standard heterogeneous-agent models when Bayesian households with unobserved-component expectations misattribute equilibrium amplification to bigger shocks, throug...
-
The Trouble with Rational Expectations in Heterogeneous Agent Models: A Challenge for Macroeconomics
A leading macroeconomist argues that rational expectations about equilibrium prices in heterogeneous-agent models are implausibly complex and should be replaced by simpler, empirically disciplined price forecasts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.