Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bottom Quark Mass with Calibrated Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.02348 v1 pith:BQOTWQXH submitted 2022-03-04 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords alphabottomexperimentalmassmomentsquarkuncertaintyacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We determine the bottom quark mass $\hat{m}_b$ from QCD sum rules of moments of the vector current correlator calculated in perturbative QCD to ${\cal O} (\hat\alpha_s^3)$. Our approach is based on the mutual consistency across a set of moments where experimental data are required for the resonance contributions only. Additional experimental information from the continuum region can then be used for stability tests and to assess the theoretical uncertainty. We find $\hat{m}_b(\hat{m}_b) = (4180.2 \pm 7.9)$ MeV for $\hat\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1182$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Calibrated correlation between heavy-quark masses and Hadronic Vacuum Polarization observables at the precision frontier

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A generalized QCD sum rule with the HVP kernel as weight simultaneously determines heavy-quark masses and their muon g-2 contributions, with reduced uncertainty.

  2. The Higgs boson through the lens of electroweak precision data

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Updated Gfitter EW fit with new MW average yields SM-consistent indirect observables and, via kappa_V from oblique parameters plus LHC signal strengths, determines Gamma_H to ~10% precision under leading-log assumptions.

Pith tools