REVIEW 2 cited by
Constant-roll inflation driven by holographic dark energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The scenario of constant-roll inflation is investigated assuming that it is caused by holographic dark energy with energy density $3M_p^2 c^2 / L^2$. The energy density with varying $c$ parameter and Hubble radius as infrared cutoff provides a proper description for the late time acceleration expansion. This motivates us to study the role of the same holographic dark energy in the scenario of constant-roll inflation. One of the main features of constant-roll inflation is that the second slow-roll parameter is constant which is not necessarily small. This feature brings a differential equation for the parameter $c$. After finding an analytical solution for the parameter, the observable parameters are obtained at the time of inflation, and by comparing the model with data, the constants of the model are determined. The energy scale of inflation is estimated which is about $10^{16} \; {\rm GeV}$. Finally, a correspondence between the HDE and canonical scalar field is considered and the behavior of the constructed potential and its magnitude is discussed.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Constraining Quintessential Inflation with ACT: A Gauss-Bonnet Gateway
Exponential and sech Gauss–Bonnet couplings restore ACT-compatible ns and r for quintessential inflation, while tanh fails for a structural sign reason; reheating remains BBN-safe.
-
Power Law Plateau Inflation and Primary Gravitational Waves in the light of ACT
Power-law plateau inflation can sit inside the 1 sigma region of ACT DR6, but the reheating bound from gravitational waves forces the total number of e-folds N_k below about 62.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.