REVIEW 2 cited by
The collider landscape: which collider for establishing the SM instability?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Capabilities of future colliders are usually discussed assuming specific hypothetical new physics. We consider the opposite possibility: that no new physics is accessible, and we want to learn if the unnatural Standard Model is part of a vast landscape. We argue that a main step in this direction would be establishing the possible instability scale of the Higgs potential. This primarily needs reducing the uncertainty on the strong coupling and on the top quark mass. We show that the top quark mass can be measured well enough via a $t \bar t$ threshold scan with low $10^{33}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm sec}^{-1}$ luminosity, that seems achievable at a `small' $e^+ e^-$ collider in the LEP tunnel, or at the first low-energy stage of a muon collider.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Vacuum Metastability from Axion-Higgs Criticality
An ALP-Higgs coupling can lower the vacuum instability scale to near the weak scale, predicting an axion-like particle between 1 MeV and 20 GeV that future experiments can fully probe.
-
An introduction to effective potential methods in field theory
A review of standard effective potential methods and their applications to electroweak metastability, Higgs inflation, and cosmological phase transitions; it contains no new research results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.