Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distinguishing Dirac vs. Majorana Neutrinos: a Cosmological Probe

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.00808 v1 pith:VEC4DSZK submitted 2022-05-02 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Distinguishing Dirac vs. Majorana Neutrinos: a Cosmological Probe

classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords neutrinosdiraccapturehelicitymajoranabackgroundcalculatecase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cosmic background neutrinos ($C_{\nu}B)$ helicity composition is different for Dirac or Majorana neutrinos making detectors based on $C_{\nu}B$ capture sensitive to the nature of neutrinos. We calculate, for the first time, the helicity changes of neutrinos crossing dark matter fields, to quantitatively calculate this effect on the capture rate. We show that a fraction of neutrinos change their helicity, regardless of them being deflected by a void or a dark matter halo. The average signal from the 100 most massive voids or halos in a Gpc$^3$ gives a prediction that if neutrinos are Dirac, the density of the $C_{\nu} B$ background measured on Earth should be 48 cm${^{-3}}$ for left-helical neutrinos, a decrease of 15% (53.6 cm${^{-3}}$; 5%) for a halo (void) with respect to the standard calculation without including gravitational effects due to large scale structures. In terms of the total capture rate in a 100 g tritium detector, this translates in $4.9^{+1.1}_{-0.8}$ neutrinos per year for the Dirac case, as a function of the unknown neutrino mass scale, or 8.1 per year if neutrinos are Majorana. Thus although smaller than the factor two for the non-relativistic case, it is still large enough to be detected and it highlights the power of future $C_{\nu} B$ detectors, as an alternative to neutrinoless double beta decay experiments, to discover the neutrino nature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pathways and impediments towards a detection of the relic neutrino wind

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Detecting the cosmic neutrino background's dipole anisotropy via tritium capture requires ~10^5 times the exposure needed for flux detection, with Majorana neutrinos suffering an additional (m_ν/T_ν)^2 suppression.

  2. Gravitational Wave Signature and the Nature of Neutrino Masses: Majorana, Dirac, or Pseudo-Dirac?

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the minimal B-L gauge extension, Majorana neutrinos at high breaking scale produce flat GW spectra from cosmic strings, Dirac at low scale produce peaked spectra from first-order phase transitions, and pseudo-Dirac...