REVIEW 2 cited by
A new coupled three-form dark energy model and implications for the $H_0$ tension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We propose a new coupled three-form dark energy model to relieve the Hubble tension in this paper. Firstly, by performing a dynamical analysis with the coupled three-form dark energy model, we obtain four fixed points, including a saddle point representing a radiation dominated Universe, a saddle point representing a matter dominated Universe, and two attractors representing two saturated de Sitter Universes. Secondly, by confronting the coupled three-form dark energy model and the $\Lambda$ cold dark matter model (the $\Lambda$CDM model) with cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) observations, we obtain $H_0= 67.8_{-0.6}^{+0.7}$($1\sigma$ level) km/s/Mpc for the coupled three-form dark energy model and $H_0=67.6_{-0.5}^{+0.5}$($1\sigma$ level) km/s/Mpc for the $\Lambda$CDM model, the former is in strong tension with the latest local measured $H_0$ value at $4.3\sigma$ confidence level, while the latter is in strong tension with the latest local measured $H_0$ value at $5.1\sigma$ level.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Model-independent late-universe measurements of $H_0$ and $\Omega_K$ with the parametrization based on cosmic age-improved inverse distance ladder
A cosmic-age-based inverse distance ladder with DESI DR2, DESY5, SGL, CC and GRB data gives H0=71.59±0.94 km/s/Mpc and ΩK=0.001±0.038.
-
Dark Energy Is Not That Into You: Variable Couplings after DESI DR2 BAO
With DESI DR2 data, one interacting dark sector model with a time-dependent coupling shows a nonzero coupling at more than 95% CL, but Bayesian evidence still favors Lambda-CDM.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.