REVIEW 2 cited by
Leptoquarks, axions and the unification of B, L, and Peccei-Quinn symmetries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, axion models supplemented by leptoquarks and diquarks are systematically analyzed. Turning on some couplings to and among these latter states permits to unify the Peccei-Quinn symmetry with baryon (B) and lepton (L) numbers, such that the axion becomes associated to the spontaneous breaking of the three $U(1)$ symmetries. All possible four- and six-fermion patterns of B and L violation are discussed, including those inducing proton decay, with $\Delta B = 1$ and $\Delta L = \pm 1, \pm 3$, neutron-antineutron oscillations with $\Delta B = 2$, and Majorana neutrino masses with $\Delta L = 2$. Scenarios in which one or two axion fields necessarily appear in any B and/or L violating operators are also constructed. Nucleon decays would then necessarily involve an axion in the final state, while neutron-antineutron oscillations would only happen in an axionic background. This could have implications for the neutron lifetime puzzle, and more generally, opens the door to new phenomenological and cosmological applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Dark-matter induced neutron-antineutron oscillations
True QCD axion dark matter cannot induce observable neutron-antineutron oscillations, because its Goldstone nature forces competing axionless baryon-number-violating effects that are already ruled out.
-
The strong CP puzzle and axions
A review of the strong CP problem and axion mechanisms, with a model-building argument that the axion's Peccei-Quinn symmetry can merge with baryon and lepton number and perhaps explain neutrino masses and baryogenesis.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.