Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TabSynDex: A Universal Metric for Robust Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.05295 v2 pith:26VVQXZ7 submitted 2022-07-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datasyntheticmetrictabsyndextabularevaluationexistinggeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Synthetic tabular data generation becomes crucial when real data is limited, expensive to collect, or simply cannot be used due to privacy concerns. However, producing good quality synthetic data is challenging. Several probabilistic, statistical, generative adversarial networks (GANs), and variational auto-encoder (VAEs) based approaches have been presented for synthetic tabular data generation. Once generated, evaluating the quality of the synthetic data is quite challenging. Some of the traditional metrics have been used in the literature but there is lack of a common, robust, and single metric. This makes it difficult to properly compare the effectiveness of different synthetic tabular data generation methods. In this paper we propose a new universal metric, TabSynDex, for robust evaluation of synthetic data. The proposed metric assesses the similarity of synthetic data with real data through different component scores which evaluate the characteristics that are desirable for ``high quality'' synthetic data. Being a single score metric and having an implicit bound, TabSynDex can also be used to observe and evaluate the training of neural network based approaches. This would help in obtaining insights that was not possible earlier. We present several baseline models for comparative analysis of the proposed evaluation metric with existing generative models. We also give a comparative analysis between TabSynDex and existing synthetic tabular data evaluation metrics. This shows the effectiveness and universality of our metric over the existing metrics. Source Code: \url{https://github.com/vikram2000b/tabsyndex}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness Testing through Extreme Value Theory

    cs.SE 2025-01 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper defines ECD as the difference in GEV location parameters between protected groups and claims it reveals that standard bias mitigators harm worst-case fairness in 35% of cases.

  2. Evaluating Differentially Private Generation of Domain-Specific Text

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying a new benchmark to five specialized domains, the paper shows current privacy-preserving text generators lose much of their utility and fidelity, especially at strict privacy levels and on gated datasets.

Pith tools