REVIEW 1 cited by
Unified description of high-energy nuclear collisions based on dynamical core--corona picture
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
I establish the dynamical core--corona initialization framework (DCCI2) as a state-of-the-art dynamical framework that is capable of describing small and large colliding systems at the LHC energies. Under the core--corona picture, contributions from both equilibrated (core) and non-equilibrated (corona) components are implemented. I describe the dynamical separation of the system into the core and corona at the initial stage by incorporating the core--corona picture into the novel dynamical initialization framework. With DCCI2, I simulate $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7, 13$ TeV and $Pb$+$Pb$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$ TeV. Especially, I extract the fractions of core and corona components in final hadron yields in $p$+$p$ and $Pb$+$Pb$ collisions as functions of multiplicity, and reveal that the core components become dominant at $\langle dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5} \approx 20$. I also find that the corona contribution at very low $p_T$ (below $p_T\approx1$ GeV) is non-negligible even in $Pb$+$Pb$ collisions and show that such contributions significantly affect $p_T$-integrated flow coefficients. These results strongly suggest the importance of considering non-equilibrated components to extract transport coefficients of quark-gluon plasma from model-to-data comparisons quantitatively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
UHECR measurements and physics at man-made accelerators: mutual constraints
A review of the mutual constraints between UHECR air-shower observations and accelerator measurements, centered on the muon puzzle and future experimental tests.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.