REVIEW 3 cited by
Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of model compression for deep neural networks (DNNs) in the challenging one-shot/post-training setting, in which we are given an accurate trained model, and must compress it without any retraining, based only on a small amount of calibration input data. This problem has become popular in view of the emerging software and hardware support for executing models compressed via pruning and/or quantization with speedup, and well-performing solutions have been proposed independently for both compression approaches. In this paper, we introduce a new compression framework which covers both weight pruning and quantization in a unified setting, is time- and space-efficient, and considerably improves upon the practical performance of existing post-training methods. At the technical level, our approach is based on an exact and efficient realization of the classical Optimal Brain Surgeon (OBS) framework of [LeCun, Denker, and Solla, 1990] extended to also cover weight quantization at the scale of modern DNNs. From the practical perspective, our experimental results show that it can improve significantly upon the compression-accuracy trade-offs of existing post-training methods, and that it can enable the accurate compound application of both pruning and quantization in a post-training setting.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
QuantiBias: Benchmarking Quantization-Induced Bias in LLMs
Quantization leaves refusal and multiple-choice bias checks flat while open-ended stereotype endorsement remains high (~24–27% under an independent judge), a gap standard safety evaluations miss.
-
A New Kind of Adversarial Example: Measuring the Human-Model Gap, and Its Relationship to OOD Detection
Large, clearly visible perturbations that keep a network's correct label at ~1.0 confidence leave humans (and human proxies) unable to recognize the image, are invisible to confidence/energy OOD detectors, can evade f...
-
Activation-Informed Pareto-Guided Low-Rank Compression for Efficient LLM/VLM
A single per-layer error tolerance, instead of a per-layer rank budget, improves zero-shot low-rank compression of LLMs and VLMs empirically, but the theorem that this uniform tolerance is Pareto-optimal is proven onl...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.