Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11580 v2 pith:TS3HO6W7 submitted 2022-08-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords post-trainingquantizationcompressionpruningaccurateframeworksettingbrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of model compression for deep neural networks (DNNs) in the challenging one-shot/post-training setting, in which we are given an accurate trained model, and must compress it without any retraining, based only on a small amount of calibration input data. This problem has become popular in view of the emerging software and hardware support for executing models compressed via pruning and/or quantization with speedup, and well-performing solutions have been proposed independently for both compression approaches. In this paper, we introduce a new compression framework which covers both weight pruning and quantization in a unified setting, is time- and space-efficient, and considerably improves upon the practical performance of existing post-training methods. At the technical level, our approach is based on an exact and efficient realization of the classical Optimal Brain Surgeon (OBS) framework of [LeCun, Denker, and Solla, 1990] extended to also cover weight quantization at the scale of modern DNNs. From the practical perspective, our experimental results show that it can improve significantly upon the compression-accuracy trade-offs of existing post-training methods, and that it can enable the accurate compound application of both pruning and quantization in a post-training setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QuantiBias: Benchmarking Quantization-Induced Bias in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quantization leaves refusal and multiple-choice bias checks flat while open-ended stereotype endorsement remains high (~24–27% under an independent judge), a gap standard safety evaluations miss.

  2. A New Kind of Adversarial Example: Measuring the Human-Model Gap, and Its Relationship to OOD Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large, clearly visible perturbations that keep a network's correct label at ~1.0 confidence leave humans (and human proxies) unable to recognize the image, are invisible to confidence/energy OOD detectors, can evade f...

  3. Activation-Informed Pareto-Guided Low-Rank Compression for Efficient LLM/VLM

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single per-layer error tolerance, instead of a per-layer rank budget, improves zero-shot low-rank compression of LLMs and VLMs empirically, but the theorem that this uniform tolerance is Pareto-optimal is proven onl...

Pith tools