REVIEW 2 cited by
Dark Matter: DAMA/LIBRA and its perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The long-standing model-independent annual modulation effect measured by DAMA deep underground at Gran Sasso Laboratory with different experimental configurations is summarized and perspectives will be highlighted. DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 set-up, $\simeq$ 250 kg highly radio-pure NaI(Tl) confirms the evidence of a signal that meets all the requirements of the model independent Dark Matter annual modulation signature at high C.L.; the full exposure is 2.86 ton $\times$ yr over 22 annual cycles. The experiment is currently collecting data in the DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 empowered configuration with an even lower software energy threshold. Other recent claims are shortly commented.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DAMA/LIBRA and dark matter: decisive tension or contrived cancellation
DAMA's annual modulation signal is incompatible at >5σ with ANAIS-112 and COSINE-100 under physical dark-matter recoil models; reconciliation requires contrived opposite-sign sodium/iodine tuning.
-
Uncertainties in tellurium-based dark matter searches stemming from nuclear structure uncertainties
Nuclear shell-model uncertainties cause over 100% uncertainties on some tellurium-based dark matter coupling limits, comparable to xenon, while leaving the annual modulation phase unchanged.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.