Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Full Kullback-Leibler-Divergence Loss for Hyperparameter-free Label Distribution Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.02055 v1 pith:W375HDFY submitted 2022-09-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords distributiondldllabellearninglossregressioncomponentsconcept
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The concept of Label Distribution Learning (LDL) is a technique to stabilize classification and regression problems with ambiguous and/or imbalanced labels. A prototypical use-case of LDL is human age estimation based on profile images. Regarding this regression problem, a so called Deep Label Distribution Learning (DLDL) method has been developed. The main idea is the joint regression of the label distribution and its expectation value. However, the original DLDL method uses loss components with different mathematical motivation and, thus, different scales, which is why the use of a hyperparameter becomes necessary. In this work, we introduce a loss function for DLDL whose components are completely defined by Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergences and, thus, are directly comparable to each other without the need of additional hyperparameters. It generalizes the concept of DLDL with regard to further use-cases, in particular for multi-dimensional or multi-scale distribution learning tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Capabilities and Limitations of Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Generalization and Calibration

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper derives generalization and calibration bounds for weak-to-strong generalization and extends a known regression result from squared loss to KL divergence.

Pith tools