REVIEW 2 cited by
Top partners and scalar dark matter -- a non-minimal reappraisal
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A large set of models beyond the Standard Model of particle physics suggest that the top quark plays a special role in fundamental interactions. At the same time some of these models predict that a particle responsible for dark matter is present in the physical spectrum of the theory, and in particular cases dark matter may be specially linked to the top sector. Such a new physics configuration occurs, for instance, in composite frameworks that additionally feature vector-like quarks as mediators of the interactions of the dark matter with the Standard Model. We investigate the interplay of top-philic dark matter and the presence of several vector-like top partners. Such a non-minimal setup with several vector-like fermions is typical of composite scenarios, and we make use of an effective model to study to which extent such non-minimality modifies the collider and cosmological phenomenology of the minimal model, the latter only including one vector-like mediator of the dark matter interactions with the Standard Model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Dark matter in composite Higgs models with a scotogenic EFT
In the SU(6)/Sp(6) composite Higgs model with a scotogenic Z2, three of four neutral pseudo-Goldstone dark matter candidates can reproduce the observed relic density, while the SU(2)L triplet candidate fails; spin-1 r...
-
Revisiting the Inert Scalar Dark Matter with Vector-like Quarks
A Z2-odd vector-like quark added to the inert doublet model restores the correct dark matter relic abundance for DM masses above about 550 GeV in compressed spectra.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.