REVIEW 2 cited by
Large-scale power loss in ground-based CMB mapmaking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
CMB mapmaking relies on a data model to solve for the sky map, and this process is vulnerable to bias if the data model cannot capture the full behavior of the signal. We demonstrate that this bias is not just limited to small-scale effects in high-contrast regions of the sky, but can manifest as $\mathcal{O}(1)$ power loss on large scales in the map under conditions and assumptions realistic for ground-based CMB telescopes. This bias is invisible to simulation-based tests that do not explicitly model them, making it easy to miss. We identify two different mechanisms that both cause suppression of long-wavelength modes: sub-pixel errors and detector gain calibration mismatch. We show that the specific case of subpixel bias can be eliminated using bilinear pointing matrices, but also provide simple methods for testing for the presence of large-scale model error bias in general.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: High-redshift measurement of structure growth from the cross-correlation of Quaia quasars and CMB lensing from ACT DR6 and $\textit{Planck}$ PR4
Quasar-lensing cross-correlations from ACT and Planck give σ8 = 0.804 ± 0.013 and a 12% constraint on matter fluctuation amplitude at z ≈ 5.1, consistent with ΛCDM.
-
The Simons Observatory: Validation of reconstructed power spectra from simulated filtered maps for the Small Aperture Telescope survey
This validation study finds that a transfer-function power spectrum estimator recovers unbiased cosmological parameters, including the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, in simulations of the first year of Simons Observatory s...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.