REVIEW 1 cited by
Plausible Adversarial Attacks on Direct Parameter Inference Models in Astrophysics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this abstract we explore the possibility of introducing biases in physical parameter inference models from adversarial-type attacks. In particular, we inject small amplitude systematics into inputs to a mixture density networks tasked with inferring cosmological parameters from observed data. The systematics are constructed analogously to white-box adversarial attacks. We find that the analysis network can be tricked into spurious detection of new physics in cases where standard cosmological estimators would be insensitive. This calls into question the robustness of such networks and their utility for reliably detecting new physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Field-Level Comparison and Robustness Analysis of Cosmological N-body Simulations
A CNN trained on one N-body code transfers well to other non-AMR codes but fails on AMR simulations and mismatched resolutions; Gaussian smoothing of about six grid cells makes the simulations statistically consistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.