Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Plausible Adversarial Attacks on Direct Parameter Inference Models in Astrophysics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.14788 v1 pith:5UPFZ5E2 submitted 2022-11-27 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords attacksadversarialcosmologicalinferencemodelsnetworksparameterphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this abstract we explore the possibility of introducing biases in physical parameter inference models from adversarial-type attacks. In particular, we inject small amplitude systematics into inputs to a mixture density networks tasked with inferring cosmological parameters from observed data. The systematics are constructed analogously to white-box adversarial attacks. We find that the analysis network can be tricked into spurious detection of new physics in cases where standard cosmological estimators would be insensitive. This calls into question the robustness of such networks and their utility for reliably detecting new physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Field-Level Comparison and Robustness Analysis of Cosmological N-body Simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A CNN trained on one N-body code transfers well to other non-AMR codes but fails on AMR simulations and mismatched resolutions; Gaussian smoothing of about six grid cells makes the simulations statistically consistent.

Pith tools