REVIEW 2 cited by
Next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to $J/\psi$ plus $\eta_c$ production at the $B$ factories
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we calculate the next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD corrections to $e^+e^- \to J/\psi+\eta_c$ at the $B$ factories. After including the NNLO corrections, the cross section of $e^+e^- \to J/\psi+\eta_c$ is enhanced by about $17\%$, and the perturbative series of the prediction shows the convergent behavior. It is also found that the contribution from bottom quark starts at the $\alpha_s^3$-order, which is about $2.4\%$ of the total prediction. The renormalization scale $\mu_R$ dependence of the cross section is reduced at the NNLO level, but the prediction is sensitive to the charm quark mass $m_c$. By considering the uncertainties caused by renormalization scale $\mu_R$, charm quark mass $m_c$ and the NRQCD factorization scale $\mu_\Lambda$, our prediction shows agreement with the BABAR and BELLE measurements within errors.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Analytical two-loop amplitudes of $e^{+} e^{-} \longrightarrow \boldsymbol{J} / \boldsymbol{\psi}+\boldsymbol{\eta}_c$ at $B$ factories
The authors present the first analytical two-loop NRQCD amplitude for e+e- to J/psi+eta_c as an expansion in m_c^2/s, with cross-section predictions consistent (within uncertainties) with B-factory data.
-
Revisiting relativistic corrections to inclusive $J/\psi$ production at B factories: Complete expansion for three-body quarkonium production
Full final-state kinematic expansion yields scheme-independent O(v²) corrections of about −14.6% (cc̄) and +12% (non-cc̄) for inclusive J/ψ at B factories, yet tension with Belle data remains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.