Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.04612 v3 pith:SG7MSVS4 submitted 2022-12-09 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords influencetraininganalysisdataestimationgoodmethodsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Good models require good training data. For overparameterized deep models, the causal relationship between training data and model predictions is increasingly opaque and poorly understood. Influence analysis partially demystifies training's underlying interactions by quantifying the amount each training instance alters the final model. Measuring the training data's influence exactly can be provably hard in the worst case; this has led to the development and use of influence estimators, which only approximate the true influence. This paper provides the first comprehensive survey of training data influence analysis and estimation. We begin by formalizing the various, and in places orthogonal, definitions of training data influence. We then organize state-of-the-art influence analysis methods into a taxonomy; we describe each of these methods in detail and compare their underlying assumptions, asymptotic complexities, and overall strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we propose future research directions to make influence analysis more useful in practice as well as more theoretically and empirically sound. A curated, up-to-date list of resources related to influence analysis is available at https://github.com/ZaydH/influence_analysis_papers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding Data Influence with Differential Approximation

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces Diff-In, an influence estimator that accumulates second-order approximations of influence differences across training steps and shows strong accuracy in data cleaning, deletion, and coreset selec...

  2. Dataset Distillation by Influence Matching

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Inf-Match distills datasets by matching estimated parameter influence of real and synthetic data, reporting SOTA classification and retrieval, but with an unsupported theoretical core.

  3. A Comparative Analysis of Influence Signals for Data Debugging

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A benchmark shows Self-Influence finds mislabeled training samples, while all tested influence signals fail to detect clustered anomalies and outliers under cumulative TracIn scoring.

  4. DeGLIF for Label Noise Robust Node Classification using GNNs

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DeGLIF identifies noisy graph nodes by approximating how much each node's removal would improve loss on a small clean set, relabels them with the model's most confident alternative class, and retrains, improving accur...

Pith tools